United States v. Childress

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Childress

466 F. App'x 216

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 22, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7531

StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Childress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Childress, 466 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Little Tom Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Childress, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-6, 2011 WL 5196530 (W.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense -with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Little Tom Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Childress, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-6, 2011 WL 5196530 (W.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense -with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-childress-ca4-2012.