United States v. Childress

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Childress

466 F. App'x 216

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2012·No. No. 11-7531·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Little Tom Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Childress, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-6, 2011 WL 5196530 (W.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense -with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Little Tom Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Childress, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-6, 2011 WL 5196530 (W.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense -with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Childress, 466 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

466 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Childress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.