United States v. Childress

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Childress

304 F. App'x 183

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2008·No. No. 08-7224·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Little Tom Childress, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for immediate termination of his supervised release term. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Childress, No. 7:94-cr-40106-jlk-6 (W.D.Va. July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Little Tom Childress, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for immediate termination of his supervised release term. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Childress, No. 7:94-cr-40106-jlk-6 (W.D.Va. July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Childress, 304 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

304 F. App'x 183 (United States v. Childress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.