United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company

Tenth Circuit

United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company

280 F.2d 429, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5383

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 1960

Docket6152

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 F.2d 429 (United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, 280 F.2d 429, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5383 (10th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

280 F.2d 429

UNITED STATES of America
v.
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 6152.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1960.

Donald G. Brotzman, U.S. Atty., and Robert S. Wham, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellant.

J. C. Street and W. L. Peck, Denver, Colo., and C. W. Krohl, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on authority of United States of America v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad, 361 U.S. 78, 80 S.Ct. 12, 4 L.Ed.2d 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI