United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co.

298 U.S. 689, 56 S. Ct. 957
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1936·No. No. 1015·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth [690]*690Circuit denied.

Solicitor General Reed for the United States. Messrs. J. C. James and Bruce Scott for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co., 298 U.S. 689, 56 S. Ct. 957 (1936).

298 U.S. 689 (United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Prudence Bonds Corp.
122 F.2d 258 (Second Circuit, 1941)
Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist. v. Abney
2 So. 2d 428 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)
In re Prudence Co.
19 F. Supp. 707 (E.D. New York, 1937)