United States v. Chestnut

589 F. App'x 95
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2014·No. No. 14-7265·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s orders denying without prejudice his motion to correct the presen-tence investigation report and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chestnut, No. 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 1 & Aug. 18, 2014). [96] Chestnut’s motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of a transcript at Government expense are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chestnut, 589 F. App'x 95 (4th Cir. 2014).

589 F. App'x 95 (United States v. Chestnut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.