United States v. Chester F. Stone

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2000
Docket99-4304
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Chester F. Stone (United States v. Chester F. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Chester F. Stone, (4th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-4304

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHESTER FRANCIS STONE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-98- 386-AMD)

Submitted: December 29, 1999 Decided: January 20, 2000

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Van Bavel, WALKER & VAN BAVEL, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Martin J. Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Chester Francis Stone appeals from a 180-month sentence im-

posed following his conditional guilty plea to being a felon in

possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 1999).

Stone alleges that the district court erred when it denied his

motion to suppress. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. See United States v. Raymond, 152 F.2d 309, 312

(4th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we affirm Stone’s conviction and

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Home Ins. Co. v. Tydal Co.
152 F.2d 309 (Fifth Circuit, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Chester F. Stone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chester-f-stone-ca4-2000.