United States v. Cheryl Anderson
This text of 530 F. App'x 611 (United States v. Cheryl Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cheryl Anderson appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed upon revoking her probation. She argues only that the district court committed procedural error by selecting a sentence based on “clearly erroneous facts.” After careful review, we conclude that the district court based its sentencing decision on appropriate considerations and that no abuse of discretion occurred. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 919, 922 (8th Cir.2009) (appellate court reviews probation revocation sentence for abuse of discretion, using same standards as those applied to initial sentencing decisions). Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 F. App'x 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cheryl-anderson-ca8-2013.