United States v. Cheng

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-7258 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:24-cr-00256-MTK-1 v. MEMORANDUM* SHAOFEI CHENG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mustafa T. Kasubhai, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 22, 2026**

Before: CANBY, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Shaofei Cheng appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his

supervised release and challenges the 36-month term of supervised release

imposed to follow 11 months of imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The maximum supervised release term authorized for Cheng’s underlying

offense of conviction is 36 months. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 876(c), 3581(b)(3),

3583(b)(2). As the parties agree, the district court erred by failing to reduce this

term by the 11-month carceral sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) (“[A] term of

supervised release shall not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by

statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release, less

any term of imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of supervised

release.”); United States v. Knight, 580 F.3d 933, 938-40 (9th Cir. 2009). We

therefore vacate the judgment and remand solely for the district court to reduce the

supervised release term to no more than 25 months.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 25-7258