United States v. Chenault

25 F. Cas. 419, 2 D.C. 70, 2 Cranch 70

This text of 25 F. Cas. 419 (United States v. Chenault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Chenault, 25 F. Cas. 419, 2 D.C. 70, 2 Cranch 70 (circtddc 1813).

Opinion

The CouRT

refused to instruct the jury that the offence charged was not indictable ; but told them it was not extortion.

. The CouRT also refused to suffer parol evidence to be given of the contents of the warrant without producing it, or accounting, satisfactorily for its non-production.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Cas. 419, 2 D.C. 70, 2 Cranch 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chenault-circtddc-1813.