United States v. Chavis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chavis. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 F.3d 871
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 8, 1996·No. 95-40729·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40729 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEROME ARTHUR CHAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:93-CR-25-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

On appeal after remand, Jerome Arthur Chavis challenges the

district court's denial of the motion to suppress by arguing that

his continued detention after the traffic stop exceeded the

bounds of the Fourth Amendment. For essentially the same reasons

as explained by the district court, see United States v. Chavis,

902 F. Supp. 111 (E.D. Tex. 1995), we

AFFIRM.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chavis, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Chavis (United States v. Chavis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Chavis
902 F. Supp. 111 (E.D. Texas, 1995)