United States v. Chavez-Rodriguez
This text of 320 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Chavez-Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Concepcion Chavez-Rodriguez appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal.
[560]*560Chavez-Rodriguez contends that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement does not preclude this appeal because he could not reasonably foresee the sentencing enhancements applied by the district court. Chavez-Rodriguez does not contend that the waiver was not knowing and voluntary. We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid and enforceable and that it precludes this appeal. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chavez-rodriguez-ca9-2009.