United States v. Chavez
This text of United States v. Chavez (United States v. Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before TANG, J. STEPHENS, and ATTANASIO Appellate Military Judges _________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
German A. CHAVEZ Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201900147
Decided: 29 August 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major John L. Ferriter, USMC; Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey V. Munoz, USMC. Sentence adjudged 27 February 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pend- leton, CA, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence ap- proved by convening authority: reduction to E-1, confinement for 89 days, and a bad-conduct discharge1. For Appellant: Captain Jeremiah J. Sullivan, III, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). _________________________
1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 6 months pursu- ant to a pretrial agreement. United States v. Chavez, No. 201900147
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor- rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. However, we note that the “Action” section of the court-martial order (CMO) does not accurately reflect that the suspended bad-conduct discharge is to be remitted. Although we find no prejudice from this scrivener’s error, the appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N- M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998). Accordingly, the supplemental CMO shall reflect that the suspended bad-conduct discharge is to be remitted 6 months from the date of the CMO, unless sooner vacated. The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Chavez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chavez-nmcca-2019.