United States v. Chavez

141 F. App'x 381
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2005
Docket04-41686
StatusUnpublished

This text of 141 F. App'x 381 (United States v. Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Chavez, 141 F. App'x 381 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Eduardo Efrain Chavez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for pos *382 session of more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b)(1)(A). He argues that the sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Chavez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir.2000). See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 731 (5th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005)(No. 05-5556). He raises the issue only to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Chavez’s argument is foreclosed, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo
407 F.3d 728 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 F. App'x 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chavez-ca5-2005.