United States v. Chavez-Baltazar
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40186 c/w No. 06-40196 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CELSO CHAVEZ-BALTAZAR,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-149 --------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed for Celso Chavez-
Baltazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chavez-
Baltazar has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our
independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-40186 c/w No. 06-40196 -2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Chavez-Baltazar (United States v. Chavez-Baltazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.