United States v. Chavers

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Chavers

679 F. App'x 985

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 2017

DocketNo. 15-11126 Non-Argument Calendar

StatusPublished

This text of 679 F. App'x 985 (United States v. Chavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Chavers, 679 F. App'x 985 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Chavers appeals the district court’s denial of his motion—based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines—to reduce his sentence, pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). The district court correctly concluded that Chavers was ineligible for a sentence reduction. Amendment 782 did not lower his guidelines range. Amend[986]*986ment 782 only impacts on the guideline ranges under § 2Dl.l(c). Chavers was sentenced using the guideline provisions in U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(d), § 2A1.1, and § 5G1.2(a).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Chavers appeals the district court’s denial of his motion—based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines—to reduce his sentence, pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). The district court correctly concluded that Chavers was ineligible for a sentence reduction. Amendment 782 did not lower his guidelines range. Amend[986]*986ment 782 only impacts on the guideline ranges under § 2Dl.l(c). Chavers was sentenced using the guideline provisions in U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(d), § 2A1.1, and § 5G1.2(a).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 F. App'x 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chavers-ca11-2017.