United States v. Chavers

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Chavers

679 F. App'x 985

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 7, 2017·No. No. 15-11126 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Chavers appeals the district court’s denial of his motion—based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines—to reduce his sentence, pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). The district court correctly concluded that Chavers was ineligible for a sentence reduction. Amendment 782 did not lower his guidelines range. Amend[986] ment 782 only impacts on the guideline ranges under § 2Dl.l(c). Chavers was sentenced using the guideline provisions in U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(d), § 2A1.1, and § 5G1.2(a).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Chavers appeals the district court’s denial of his motion—based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines—to reduce his sentence, pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). The district court correctly concluded that Chavers was ineligible for a sentence reduction. Amendment 782 did not lower his guidelines range. Amend[986] ment 782 only impacts on the guideline ranges under § 2Dl.l(c). Chavers was sentenced using the guideline provisions in U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(d), § 2A1.1, and § 5G1.2(a).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Chavers, 679 F. App'x 985 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

679 F. App'x 985 (United States v. Chavers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.