United States v. Chauncey Bernard Davis

59 F.3d 171, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23443, 1995 WL 369432
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 1995
Docket94-5636
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 171 (United States v. Chauncey Bernard Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Chauncey Bernard Davis, 59 F.3d 171, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23443, 1995 WL 369432 (6th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 171
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chauncey Bernard DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-5636.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 20, 1995.

Before: JONES and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; DOWD, District Judge.*

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Chauncey Davis, appeals from the sentence he received after entering a plea of guilty to drug-trafficking charges. He contends that inclusion in his criminal history of a state conviction was improper because the sentencing state judge failed to advise him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination prior to his pleading guilty to the state charge.

Defendant's appeal is without merit because he may not, under the circumstances of this case, collaterally attack the state conviction. Custis v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 1732, 1738-39 (1994); United States v. Bonds, 48 F.3d 184, 186 (6th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, defendant's sentence is affirmed.

*

The Honorable David D. Dowd, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William Michael Bonds
48 F.3d 184 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Custis v. United States
511 U.S. 485 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 171, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23443, 1995 WL 369432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chauncey-bernard-davis-ca6-1995.