United States v. Chasteen

17 M.J. 800, 1983 CMR LEXIS 699
U S Air Force Court of Military Review·Decided December 15, 1983·No. ACM 23946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION

PER CURIAM:

In our initial review of this case this court decreed:

Specifications 7 and 8 of Charge III are dismissed. Specification 5 of Charge III is set aside. The remaining findings of guilty are affirmed. If a rehearing on Specification 5 of Charge III is deemed impracticable, that allegation may be dismissed, and a rehearing on sentence shall be held based on the remaining findings of guilty.

United States v. Chasteen, 17 M.J. 580 (A.F.C.M.R.1983).

Although our decree in the case did not specifically state “the sentence is set aside” and a rehearing ordered, such provision is clearly implicit.* As a result, appellate defense counsel have moved we reconsider our original decision and remove any doubt which may exist as to its import. The motion is granted. Appellant’s Motion for Leave to Answer Reply to Motion for Reconsideration and For Leave to File Documents is also granted.

To clarify and remove any possible ambiguity, we hold: Specifications 7 and 8 of Charge III are dismissed. The finding of guilty of Specification 5 of Charge III is set aside and a rehearing ordered. The remaining findings of guilty are affirmed. The sentence is set aside and a rehearing thereon is ordered. If a rehearing on Specification 5 of Charge III is deemed impracticable, that allegation may be dismissed, and the rehearing on sentence shall be held based on the remaining affirmed findings of guilty.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chasteen, 17 M.J. 800, 1983 CMR LEXIS 699 (usafctmilrev 1983).

17 M.J. 800 (United States v. Chasteen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Williams
29 M.J. 41 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1989)
United States v. Rehak
25 M.J. 790 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1988)