United States v. Chartier
This text of 156 F. App'x 913 (United States v. Chartier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court’s finding that Randall Wilkin Chartier was a leader or organizer of the marijuana manufacturing operation, and therefore was not eligible for a reduced sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), did not violate Chartier’s Sixth Amendment rights. United States v. Labrada-Bustamante, 428 F.3d 1252, 1261-62 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the “safety valve” provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) is not unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), or Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 F. App'x 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chartier-ca9-2005.