United States v. Charles S. Howard Co.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Charles S. Howard Co.

52 F.2d 340, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3705

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 11, 1931

DocketNo. 6422

StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.2d 340 (United States v. Charles S. Howard Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Charles S. Howard Co., 52 F.2d 340, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3705 (9th Cir. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case to United States v. Central Stockholders’ Corporation of Vallejo, a Corporation, and Southern California Edison Company, a Corporation (C. C. A.) 52 F.(2d) 322, decided August 29, 1931, and on the authority of that ease the decree of dismissal is amended to provide that the dismissal is without prejudice to the proprietary rights of the United States in and to its public lands and water rights appurte.nant thereto, and as thus modified is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case to United States v. Central Stockholders’ Corporation of Vallejo, a Corporation, and Southern California Edison Company, a Corporation (C. C. A.) 52 F.(2d) 322, decided August 29, 1931, and on the authority of that ease the decree of dismissal is amended to provide that the dismissal is without prejudice to the proprietary rights of the United States in and to its public lands and water rights appurte.nant thereto, and as thus modified is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.2d 340, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-s-howard-co-ca9-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack