United States v. Charles Rose, A/K/A Curley
This text of 455 F.2d 522 (United States v. Charles Rose, A/K/A Curley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
455 F.2d 522
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Charles ROSE, a/k/a Curley, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 497, Docket 71-2040.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 28, 1972.
Decided March 8, 1972.
Jay S. Horowitz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., and John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York, on the brief), for appellee.
Howard J. Diller, New York City, on the brief, for defendant-appellant.
Before FRIENDLY, Chief Judge, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and BONSAL, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
The judgments of conviction as entered in the District Court on both of the two counts are affirmed.
Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
455 F.2d 522, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-rose-aka-curley-ca2-1972.