United States v. Charles Robert Young

406 F.2d 528
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 1969
Docket12438
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 406 F.2d 528 (United States v. Charles Robert Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles Robert Young, 406 F.2d 528 (4th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Young appeals his conviction by the court on a charge of failing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. After having been classified as I-A and after being ordered to submit to induction he applied for a classification of I-O, Conscientious Objector, which application was denied.

A decision of the Selective Service Board as to a registrant’s classification made in conformity with regulations may be overturned by the courts only if it clearly appears that there is no basis in fact for such classification. Upon careful examination of the record we cannot say that there is no basis in fact for the Board’s determination. Therefore, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 66 S.Ct. 423, 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); United States v. Jones, 382 F.2d 255 (4 Cir. 1967); United States v. Jackson, 369 F. 2d 936, 938 (4 Cir. 1966); Blalock v. United States, 247 F.2d 615, 619 (4 Cir. 1957).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Poston
312 F. Supp. 587 (D. South Carolina, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 F.2d 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-robert-young-ca4-1969.