United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn

82 F.3d 989, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42574, 1996 WL 196103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 F.3d 1304
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 24, 1996·No. 90-3696, 94-2020·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion published at 62 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir.1995) is amended with respect to section IIC1 as follows:

(1) on page 1313, the twelfth line of the first paragraph under section IIC1, located on the right side of the page, “named” is deleted and is replaced with “identified”;
(2) on page 1314, the nineteenth line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, “named” is deleted and is replaced with “identified”;
(3) on page 1314, the twentieth line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, following “indictment” and preceding the period and footnote number, add “because their losses have been proved and are the direct result of Elliott and Melhom’s crimes of conviction”;
(4) on page 1314, the twenty-first line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, following “court’s,” add “restitution”; and
(5) on page 1314, the twenty-third through the twenty-fourth lines of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, delete “not named in the Amended Indictment” and replace with “whose losses are unsubstantiated and are too attenuated from the crimes of conviction.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn, 82 F.3d 989, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42574, 1996 WL 196103 (11th Cir. 1996).

82 F.3d 989 (United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related