United States v. Charles Parker, Jr.

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Charles Parker, Jr.

80 F.3d 1042, 1996 WL 164516

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 4, 1996·No. 94-10557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States v. Charles Parker, Jr., 80 F.3d 1042, 1996 WL 164516 (5th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

80 F.3d 1042 (United States v. Charles Parker, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related