United States v. Charles Parker, Jr.

80 F.3d 1042, 1996 WL 164516
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1996
Docket94-10557
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 F.3d 1042 (United States v. Charles Parker, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles Parker, Jr., 80 F.3d 1042, 1996 WL 164516 (5th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Henry Peterson
233 F.3d 101 (First Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F.3d 1042, 1996 WL 164516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-parker-jr-ca5-1996.