United States v. Charles Levern Hudson
This text of United States v. Charles Levern Hudson (United States v. Charles Levern Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CORRECTED [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-14428 JULY 2, 2012 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 2:07-cr-14081-KMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES LEVERN HUDSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
No. 10-14662 ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20236-AJ-2
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
versus CARMELINA VERA ROJAS,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, FAY and ANDERSON,1 Circuit Judges.2
BY THE COURT:
We previously vacated the panels’ opinions to rehear these appeals en banc.
United States v. Rojas, 659 F.3d 1055 (11th Cir. 2011); United States v. Hudson,
659 F.3d 1056 (11th Cir. 2011). The issue before us in both cases was whether the
Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which raised the quantities of crack cocaine required
to trigger mandatory-minimum penalties under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), applies to
defendants sentenced after the Act’s effective date of August 3, 2010, but whose
conduct occurred before that date.
On June 21, 2012, the United States Supreme Court answered the question
1 Senior United States Circuit Judges Peter T. Fay and R. Lanier Anderson, III, elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). 2 United States Circuit Judge Adalberto Jordan is recused from participating in the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 47.
2 and held that the more lenient mandatory-minimums in the Act do apply to all of
those defendants sentenced after August 3, 2010, when the Act took effect.
Dorsey v. United States, Nos. 11-5683; 11-5721, 2012 WL 2344463 (U.S. June
21, 2012).
Accordingly, we now vacate the defendants’ sentences, and remand both
appeals back to the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida for re-sentencing consistent with the decision by the Supreme Court.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Charles Levern Hudson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-levern-hudson-ca11-2012.