United States v. Charles Lanie Norvell (92-6335), Travis Williams (92-6336)

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Charles Lanie Norvell (92-6335), Travis Williams (92-6336)

14 F.3d 603, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37316

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1993·No. 92-6335·Published

Opinion

14 F.3d 603
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles Lanie NORVELL (92-6335), Travis Williams (92-6336),
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-6335, 92-6336.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge, WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

14 F.3d 603
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles Lanie NORVELL (92-6335), Travis Williams (92-6336),
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-6335, 92-6336.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge, WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

United States v. Charles Lanie Norvell (92-6335), Travis Williams (92-6336), 14 F.3d 603, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37316 (6th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

14 F.3d 603 (United States v. Charles Lanie Norvell (92-6335), Travis Williams (92-6336)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.