United States v. Charles L. Barnett

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Charles L. Barnett

448 F.2d 36

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 8, 1971

Docket71-1954

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 448 F.2d 36 (United States v. Charles L. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Charles L. Barnett, 448 F.2d 36 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this heroin case is affirmed.

We reject the point that the government should have produced at the trial two government informants. The short and full answer is that no demand was ever made for their production. If such a demand had been made and refused, we could consider the significance thereof. It certainly was not plain error.

Other points raised, we likewise find to be without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this heroin case is affirmed.

We reject the point that the government should have produced at the trial two government informants. The short and full answer is that no demand was ever made for their production. If such a demand had been made and refused, we could consider the significance thereof. It certainly was not plain error.

Other points raised, we likewise find to be without merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 F.2d 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-l-barnett-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack