United States v. Charles G. Gaddis

883 F.2d 76, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12455, 1989 WL 95392
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 21, 1989
Docket89-3370
StatusUnpublished

This text of 883 F.2d 76 (United States v. Charles G. Gaddis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles G. Gaddis, 883 F.2d 76, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12455, 1989 WL 95392 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

883 F.2d 76

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles G. GADDIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-3370.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 21, 1989.

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Gaddis appealed from an order remanding him to the custody of the Attorney General for the purpose of undergoing a psychiatric examination to determine his competency. The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot on the basis that the psychiatric evaluation has been completed, counsel for Gaddis has entered a notice of insanity defense and the criminal case is proceeding in the district court. Appellant has not responded.

A case is moot if the requested relief has been granted or no live controversy remains. Deakins v. Monaghan, 108 S.Ct. 523, 528-29 (1988); Great W. Sugar Co. v. Nelson, 442 U.S. 92 (1979) (per curiam). A case is moot if the court is not in a position to prevent that which has already occurred. Neighbors Organized To Insure a Sound Environment, Inc. v. McArtor, 879 F.2d 174 (6th Cir.1989). The psychiatric evaluation has been completed and the appeal is moot.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Rule 8, Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Great Western Sugar Co. v. Nelson
442 U.S. 92 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Deakins v. Monaghan
484 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
883 F.2d 76, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12455, 1989 WL 95392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-g-gaddis-ca6-1989.