United States v. Charles Franklin Hudson, Jr.
This text of 616 F. App'x 416 (United States v. Charles Franklin Hudson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Charles Hudson, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of *417 the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,- and Hudson’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 F. App'x 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-franklin-hudson-jr-ca11-2015.