United States v. Charles Frank Ferrara

Third Circuit

United States v. Charles Frank Ferrara

411 F.2d 793, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11616

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 1969

Docket17412

StatusPublished

This text of 411 F.2d 793 (United States v. Charles Frank Ferrara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Charles Frank Ferrara, 411 F.2d 793, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11616 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles F. Ferrara, was convicted by a jury in the district court of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. His principal defense in the district court was that since the detectives did not give him the Miranda, warnings when they stopped and questioned him, *794 there was a tainting of his subsequent arrest and the evidence obtained pursuant thereto. On appeal, his sole contention is that his arrest was not based upon probable cause and therefore the evidence obtained as a result of a search and seizure incident thereto warrants suppression.

Assuming that appellant laid the necessary groundwork below to raise this issue here, we have concluded, based upon the totality of the evidence and a careful study of the entire record, that there was indeed probable cause for the arrest.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles F. Ferrara, was convicted by a jury in the district court of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. His principal defense in the district court was that since the detectives did not give him the Miranda, warnings when they stopped and questioned him, *794 there was a tainting of his subsequent arrest and the evidence obtained pursuant thereto. On appeal, his sole contention is that his arrest was not based upon probable cause and therefore the evidence obtained as a result of a search and seizure incident thereto warrants suppression.

Assuming that appellant laid the necessary groundwork below to raise this issue here, we have concluded, based upon the totality of the evidence and a careful study of the entire record, that there was indeed probable cause for the arrest.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 F.2d 793, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-frank-ferrara-ca3-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack