Home/Fifth Circuit/United States v. Charles Francis O'Neill

United States v. Charles Francis O'Neill

478 F.2d 1209, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 1973
Docket73-1390
StatusPublished

This text of 478 F.2d 1209 (United States v. Charles Francis O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles Francis O'Neill, 478 F.2d 1209, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9176 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In compliance with the mandate set forth in Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully reviewed this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Jack G. Hand, Jr. Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Mills, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1397; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Charles Edward Minor, No. 30544 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409
444 F.2d 521 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Johnny Lincoln Mills, No. 71-1219 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
446 F.2d 1397 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 F.2d 1209, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-francis-oneill-ca5-1973.