United States v. Charles Edward Young, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Charles Edward Young, Jr.

418 F.2d 1240, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9858

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 1969

Docket24154_1

StatusPublished

This text of 418 F.2d 1240 (United States v. Charles Edward Young, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Charles Edward Young, Jr., 418 F.2d 1240, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9858 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this criminal appeal the sole question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The offenses are interstate transportation of certain falsely made, forged and altered travelers checks, 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and aiding and abetting another in such transportation of other such checks, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2314. We have examined the evidence and we find that, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government, it is sufficient.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this criminal appeal the sole question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The offenses are interstate transportation of certain falsely made, forged and altered travelers checks, 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and aiding and abetting another in such transportation of other such checks, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2314. We have examined the evidence and we find that, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government, it is sufficient.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

418 F.2d 1240, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-edward-young-jr-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack