United States v. Charles E. Beshers

437 F.2d 450, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12465
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1971
Docket26065_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 437 F.2d 450 (United States v. Charles E. Beshers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles E. Beshers, 437 F.2d 450, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12465 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appeal by Charles E. Beshers from a judgment convicting him of transporting in interstate commerce a forged check. (18 U.S.C. § 2314).

Neither of his two contentions has merit: the proposition is settled that securing written exemplars of handwriting from an accused does not constitute a violation of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); likewise, as this and other circuits have consistently held, “causing” the interstate transportation of a forged security (knowing the same to be forged) is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Baty v. United States, 275 F.2d 310 (9th Cir. 1960); Amer v. United States, 367 F.2d.803 (8th Cir. 1966); Halfen v. United States, 324 F.2d 52 (10th Cir. 1963); Cf. Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Riccardi
337 F. Supp. 253 (D. New Jersey, 1972)
In re Grand Jury Impaneled November 4, 1970
337 F. Supp. 253 (D. New Jersey, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 F.2d 450, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-e-beshers-ca9-1971.