United States v. Charles D. Cameron
This text of 471 F.2d 1372 (United States v. Charles D. Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before us for the second time. On the first appeal we pretermitted a consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction and reversed on other grounds. 1
On the second trial a jury found Cameron guilty of having $560 in his possession knowing that it was stolen from a bank whose deposits were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(c). His sole contention on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.
We have carefully considered the record, and, taking the view most favorable to the Government, we find substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury. Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680. The judgment is
Affirmed.
. United States v. Cameron, 5 Cir. 1972, 400 F.2d 1394.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F.2d 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-d-cameron-ca5-1973.