United States v. Charles D. Cameron

471 F.2d 1372
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 13, 1973·No. 72-3303·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us for the second time. On the first appeal we pretermitted a consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction and reversed on other grounds. 1

On the second trial a jury found Cameron guilty of having $560 in his possession knowing that it was stolen from a bank whose deposits were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(c). His sole contention on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.

We have carefully considered the record, and, taking the view most favorable to the Government, we find substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury. Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680. The judgment is

Affirmed.

1

. United States v. Cameron, 5 Cir. 1972, 400 F.2d 1394.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Charles D. Cameron, 471 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir. 1973).

471 F.2d 1372 (United States v. Charles D. Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Billy Joe Gates
481 F.2d 605 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)