United States v. Charles
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 16, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20242 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
DAMINE CHARLES,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-526-3 --------------------
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Damine Charles has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Charles was notified of
counsel’s motion, but he has not filed a response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Charles (United States v. Charles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.