United States v. Charles Bennie Hunt

45 F.3d 428, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5872, 1995 WL 3665
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 1995
Docket93-6530
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 428 (United States v. Charles Bennie Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles Bennie Hunt, 45 F.3d 428, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5872, 1995 WL 3665 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

45 F.3d 428
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Charles Bennie HUNT, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6530.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted August 16, 1994.
Decided January 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-177-C, CA-92-70-3-P)

Charles Bennie Hunt, appellant pro se. Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Charles Bennie Hunt appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting in part, and rejecting in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hunt, Nos. CR-88-177-C; CA-92-70-3-P (W.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 428, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5872, 1995 WL 3665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-bennie-hunt-ca4-1995.