United States v. Chaney
This text of United States v. Chaney (United States v. Chaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Austin T. CHANEY Aviation Electronics Technician Airman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900021
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 9 April 2019. Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 9 November 2018 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authori- ty: confinement for 4 months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct dis- charge. For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USNR. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). _________________________
Before HUTCHINSON, TANG, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges. United States v. Chaney, No. 201900021
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor- rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Chaney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chaney-nmcca-2019.