United States v. Chan

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Chan

79 F. App'x 557

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2003·No. Nos. 03-4056, 03-4057·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tom Chan and William Chan appeal the district court’s orders affirming their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chan, No. CR-01-290 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tom Chan and William Chan appeal the district court’s orders affirming their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chan, No. CR-01-290 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Chan, 79 F. App'x 557 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

79 F. App'x 557 (United States v. Chan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related