United States v. Chan
This text of United States v. Chan (United States v. Chan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4056
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TOM CHAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 03-4057
WILLIAM CHAN,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-01-290)
Submitted: August 26, 2003 Decided: October 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina; Michael W. Patrick, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellants. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tom Chan and William Chan appeal the district court’s orders
affirming their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chan,
No. CR-01-290 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Chan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chan-ca4-2003.