United States v. Chambers

318 F. App'x 433
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided April 7, 2009·No. No. 06-2405·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the statements of position submitted by the parties in this case, which has been remanded to this court by the Supreme Court, Chambers v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009). we remand this case to the district court for resentencing of the defendant in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision and the procedures set forth in Nelson v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 890, 172 L.Ed.2d 719 (2009); Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), and Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), which allow a defendant in a resentencing proceeding to raise a new argument based on statutes or judicial decisions that postdate his original sentencing, provided they are not foreclosed by the decision in his appeal from his original, vacated sentence,

So Ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chambers, 318 F. App'x 433 (7th Cir. 2009).

318 F. App'x 433 (United States v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimbrough v. United States
552 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Nelson v. United States
555 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Chambers v. United States
555 U.S. 122 (Supreme Court, 2009)