United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 F.3d 801
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 16, 2017·No. 16-1265·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT June 12, 2017

No. 16-1265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHAKA FATTAH, JR.,

Appellant

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-14-cr-00409-001)

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges

1. Motion filed by Appellant Chaka Fattah, Jr. to Amend Opinion.

Respectfully, Clerk/JK

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing Motion to Amend Opinion is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk of Court shall amend page thirty-seven of the opinion in the above captioned case such that the word “indictment” shall be replaced with the phrase “search warrant affidavit.” The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

By the Court,

s/D. Brooks Smith Chief Circuit Judge

Dated: June 16, 2017 JK/cc: Eric L. Gibson, Esq.

Paul L. Gray, Esq. Chaka Fattah, Jr. Ellen C. Brotman, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr., (3d Cir. 2017).

United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr. (United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.