United States v. Chadriquez Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2016·No. 15-7914·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7914

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHADRIQUEZ DEVON WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW- RSB)

Submitted: August 4, 2016 Decided: August 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chadriquez Devon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chadriquez Devon Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Chadriquez, Nos. 4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chadriquez Williams, (4th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Chadriquez Williams (United States v. Chadriquez Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.