United States v. Cesar Gonzalez-Garcia
This text of 609 F. App'x 403 (United States v. Cesar Gonzalez-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Cesar Ricardo Gonzalez-Garcia appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis seeking to vacate his 2011 conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in viola *404 tion of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gonzalez-Garcia claims that a copy of his Mexican birth certificate obtained in 2013 provides a basis for vacating his conviction because it proves that the version of the birth certificate admitted at trial is fake. We review de novo the district court’s denial of Gonzalez-Garcia’s coram nobis petition. See United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.2007). Gonzalez-Garcia has failed to show valid reasons for failing to challenge the authenticity of the admitted version of the birth certificate at trial. See id. at 1006-07. Moreover, he has failed to demonstrate an error of “the most fundamental character.” See Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, 604 (9th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the district court properly denied Gonzalez-Garcia coram nobis relief.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
609 F. App'x 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cesar-gonzalez-garcia-ca9-2015.