United States v. Cervantes
Opinion
Case: 25-10800 Document: 63-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 25-10800 FILED Summary Calendar January 30, 2026 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Juan Diego Cervantes,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-441-1 ______________________________
Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Diego Cervantes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cervantes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-10800 Document: 63-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2026
No. 25-10800
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cervantes (United States v. Cervantes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.