United States v. Cervantes-Avalos
This text of 35 F. App'x 670 (United States v. Cervantes-Avalos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Vincente Cervantes-Avalos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to a single count of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2).
Cervantes-Avalos’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Cervantes-Avalos did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the sentence.
We REMAND to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), consistent with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2000); United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cervantes-avalos-ca9-2002.