United States v. Certain Space in the Property Known as the Chimes Building, Syracuse, Onondaga County, State of New York

435 F.2d 872
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 1, 1970
Docket34674_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 435 F.2d 872 (United States v. Certain Space in the Property Known as the Chimes Building, Syracuse, Onondaga County, State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Certain Space in the Property Known as the Chimes Building, Syracuse, Onondaga County, State of New York, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1970).

Opinion

435 F.2d 872

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CERTAIN SPACE IN the PROPERTY KNOWN AS the CHIMES BUILDING, SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 96.

Docket 34674.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued October 8, 1970.

Decided December 1, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Edmund Port, Judge.

John B. Carroll, Syracuse, N. Y. (Nottingham, Carroll, Paltz, Coughlin & Conan and Adolph H. Huttar, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for appellants Walter J. Sampson, Bernard Greenbaum, Abner J. Mesirow and Walter A. Bogeaus, d/b/a Southeastern Industrial Dist.

William L. Allen, Jr., Syracuse, N. Y. (Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee City Investing Co.

Dirk D. Snel, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Shiro Kashiwa, Asst. Atty. Gen., James M. Sullivan, Jr., U. S. Atty., Samuel T. Betts, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., and Raymond N. Zagone, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.

Melvin & Melvin, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief for Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States, defendant-appellee.

Before MOORE, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Port's opinion. 320 F.Supp. 492 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 F.2d 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-certain-space-in-the-property-known-as-the-chimes-ca2-1970.