United States v. Ceron-Gomez
This text of 441 F. App'x 468 (United States v. Ceron-Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Francisco Javier Ceron-Gomez appeals from (1) his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and (2) the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence of imprisonment. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ceron-Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 F. App'x 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ceron-gomez-ca9-2011.