United States v. Central Illinois Public Service Company

365 F.2d 121
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 7, 1966
Docket15451_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 365 F.2d 121 (United States v. Central Illinois Public Service Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Central Illinois Public Service Company, 365 F.2d 121 (7th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, Central Illinois Public Service Company, appeals from an order of the district court granting a motion for summary judgment by the plaintiff, United States of America, in an action to vacate a strip of land adj oining the south boundary of the Shawnee National Forest upon which the defendant maintains electric power transmission lines. 1

*122 The defendant asserts its claim to maintain its power lines on this land by virtue of mesne conveyances from John Nikles, who entered the land, allegedly a part of the public domain, on February 4, I860 and later received a certificate entitling him to a patent. The official records of the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of the Interior, however, show that on May 13, 1857 a prior entryman, Hiram Walker, entered the land as the assignee of a military warrant for bounty land issued to Isabella Bowman. Walker’s warrant was cancelled on April 26, 1862 after it was discovered that it had been stolen from its original owner some time earlier. In the meantime, on December 27, 1860, the certificate issued to Nikles was cancelled because it was in conflict with the earlier Walker entry. Nikles continued in possession despite the cancellation. The land was later included within the territory described in a presidential proclamation in 1939 which set aside “all lands of the United States within the areas . . described” for the Shawnee National Forest.

An entry on public land which is prima facie valid, even though subsequently declared void, segregates the land from the public domain and prevents a second entryman from obtaining any interest in it until the prior entry has been set aside. McMichael v. Murphy, 197 U.S. 304, 311, 25 S.Ct. 460, 49 L.Ed. 766 (1905). Since the Walker entry was still a matter of official record, Nikles acquired no interest in the land and his certificate was properly cancelled. Cornelius v. Kessel, 128 U.S. 456, 461, 9 S.Ct. 122, 32 L.Ed. 482 (1888). Further, there is no evidence to establish a relinquishment by Walker at the time of Nikles’ entry. A letter sent by Walker on August 4,1860, in reply to an inquiry by the General Land Office, acknowledging Walker’s inability to support the bona fide character of the assignment under which he claimed the land cannot be considered a relinquishment and was not so considered by the Land Office. Thus the land was at all times owned by the United States and became part of the Shawnee National Forest by presidential proclamation.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The land in question is a strip approximately one hundred feet wide and twenty chains long adjoining the south boundary of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, section thirteen, township ten south, range four west, Jackson County, Illinois.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shiny Rock Mining Corp. v. United States
629 F. Supp. 877 (D. Oregon, 1986)
State of Alaska v. 13.90 Acres of Land
625 F. Supp. 1315 (D. Alaska, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 F.2d 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-central-illinois-public-service-company-ca7-1966.