United States v. Celin Montoya-Rodriguez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 2018
Docket17-40981
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Celin Montoya-Rodriguez (United States v. Celin Montoya-Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Celin Montoya-Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-40981 Document: 00514472937 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/15/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 17-40981 May 15, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CELIN JAVIER MONTOYA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1883-2

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Celin Javier Montoya-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montoya-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-40981 Document: 00514472937 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/15/2018

No. 17-40981

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Our review also reveals clerical errors in the district court’s written statement of reasons, which does not reflect the guidelines range calculated by the district court or the below-guidelines nature of the sentence imposed. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical errors in the written statement of reasons. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36; United States v. Cole, 569 F. App’x 195, 196 (5th Cir. 2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Jerome Cole
569 F. App'x 195 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Celin Montoya-Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-celin-montoya-rodriguez-ca5-2018.