United States v. Celaya-Lopez
This text of 301 F. App'x 742 (United States v. Celaya-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[743]*743MEMORANDUM
Appellant’s sufficiency of evidence challenge fails under the standard set in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Sufficient evidence supports the district court’s finding that appellant had a reasonable opportunity to escape. See United States v. Verduzco, 373 F.3d 1022, 1030 (9th Cir. 2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 F. App'x 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-celaya-lopez-ca9-2008.