United States v. Celada-Avila
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40754
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SERGIO CELADA-AVILA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-1096-3
--------------------
July 11, 2001
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Sergio Celada-Silva (“Celada”) was convicted of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), and aiding and abetting the laundering of monetary instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1956(a)(1)(A)(i). He argues that insufficient evidence existed to support his convictions. Celada also argues that the district court erred by failing to admit hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(1).
We conclude that sufficient evidence existed to support Celada’s convictions. See United States v. Garcia Abrego, 141 F.3d
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-40754
-2-
142, 160-62 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Gallo, 927 F.2d 815, 822 (5th Cir. 1991). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by not admitting hearsay evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(1). See United States v. Atkins, 618 F.2d 366, 373 (5th Cir. 1980). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Celada-Avila (United States v. Celada-Avila) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.