United States v. Celada-Avila

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 2001
Docket00-40754
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Celada-Avila (United States v. Celada-Avila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Celada-Avila, (5th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40754 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERGIO CELADA-AVILA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-1096-3 -------------------- July 11, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sergio Celada-Silva (“Celada”) was convicted of conspiracy to

launder monetary instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h),

and aiding and abetting the laundering of monetary instruments, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1956(a)(1)(A)(i). He argues that

insufficient evidence existed to support his convictions. Celada

also argues that the district court erred by failing to admit

hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(1).

We conclude that sufficient evidence existed to support

Celada’s convictions. See United States v. Garcia Abrego, 141 F.3d

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-40754 -2-

142, 160-62 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Gallo, 927 F.2d 815,

822 (5th Cir. 1991). We also conclude that the district court did

not abuse its discretion by not admitting hearsay evidence under

Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(1). See United States v. Atkins, 618 F.2d

366, 373 (5th Cir. 1980). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert Atkins
618 F.2d 366 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Jose Alvaro Gallo
927 F.2d 815 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Celada-Avila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-celada-avila-ca5-2001.