United States v. Cedric L. Roulette

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cedric L. Roulette. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 F.3d 418
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 8, 1997·No. 96-2542·Unpublished

Opinion

_____________

No. 96-2542WM _____________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Cedric L. Roulette, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________

Submitted: December 31, 1996

Filed: January 8, 1997 _____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

Cedric L. Roulette appeals the sentence imposed by the district court. Having reviewed the record, we reject Roulette's contention that the district court improperly enhanced Roulette's sentence for possession of a firearm. We also reject Roulette's argument that the sentence imposed was vindictive. The district court's sentence was correct and further discussion is not warranted. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cedric L. Roulette, (8th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Cedric L. Roulette (United States v. Cedric L. Roulette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.